The institution cooperates with other institutions in adopting a systematic, workflow-based approach to managing prosecutions.
This will enable the development of a common process among all institutions involved in a prosecution, in order to coordinate actions and make them more consistent.
Transparent systematization adds value to the system since it gives a predictable character to the institution’s behaviour.
Guideline code
CCC_01900
Mechanism
Mechanism
- Decisions on whether to process prosecutions of contributors or employers could be based on a cost–benefit analysis.
- Alternatively, if the prosecution policy is meant to send strong deterrent signals, cost issues may not be the overriding factor in deciding whether to proceed.
- The system should automate:
- Data flow from risk-based case identification to case management in the field and vice versa;
- Case distribution among staff, taking into account different factors such as technical affinity and workload;
- Performance evaluation of fraud control tasks.
Parent
Structure
Structure
- The management should commission the design and implementation of prosecution operations systems and establish duties and responsibilities to manage these tasks.
- The systems should automate data flow from risk-based case identification to case management in the field and vice versa, case distribution among staff and performance evaluation of fraud control tasks.
Title HTML
Guideline 15. Adopting a systematic approach to managing prosecutions
Type
Guideline_1
Weight
24